windows 10 microsoft outlook populating to for new email

#Windows 10 microsoft outlook populating to for new email full

Set outlook cache to 3 months / Exit outlook / delete OST file. So this just got interesting, out of curiosity i started testing each cache level and it seems like unless i do the 'Update Folder' option, Outlook is only reading 14 emails from somewhere.? Exchange side Cache of some sort? I went as far as to create a new user / mailbox, exported the old Jobs emails to pst via Exchange console and import them into the new Jobs email account.

I am starting to hit a wall here as to why Outlook refuses to show all of the emails in the folders? Could this be underlying permission issues with the 2 working users with private settings on emails. The back end is Exchange 2010 fully patched and updated. This one folder (issue happens on others but we will focus on this one) has 38 total emails in it, how ever this one user and my test account, when added in outlook, only show 14 total mail items.įirst searches lead me to Delegation issue and contents set to private, however I went as far as giving my test account on the folder Owner rights, and till only 14 emails show up. Both Wind/ O365 Pro Plus Outlook latest and greatest updates 1 user is Windows 7 with Outlook 2013, the other is Windand O365 Pro Plus Outlook latest and greatest.ġ user, as well as my test user, do not see all the emails in folders.

#Windows 10 microsoft outlook populating to for new email full

We have 3 users who access said mailbox via 'Manage Full Access Permission' (i also tried setting permissions via powershell with no difference)Ģ users can see all contents and all emails fine. Uh-Hu, I even created an entirely new mailbox and imported the mails from the old one to the new one, and briefly it seemed like the problem went away but it has appeared again. Yup, already turned off Cache mode for Outlookģ.

Yes, I already set my account to download all emails (not set for 12 months and even then these emails are all from 2018)Ģ. I have a very very interesting issue here, and it is not what you think (maybe?)ġ.